With all these complications, it is no wonder no responsible person wanted to answer her and displease the two popes and the Left. He has also accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which wrongly considered the baptism of desire as referring to visible and known people saved outside the Church. Pope Pius XII also says that acts performed by clergy without juridical mission are yet gravely illicit. The clergy of the Society are not considered legitimate Catholic ministers. Is Maike Hickson willing to study this issue with this starting point?ġ.BOD,BOB and I.I never were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.Ģ.Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance) etc are not exceptions to the the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.ģ.Pope Benedict was interpreting Vatican Council II in 2016 with LG 16,LG 8, LG 14, NA 2, UR 3 etc as referring to known cases saved outside the Church. On the latest episode of the 1P5 Podcast, Steve drops the latest numbers on coronavirus before pivoting to an article from Church Militant alleging multiple instances of sexual abuse or coverup within the Society of Saint Pius X as well as the role overt bias plays in the credibility of such stories. The SSPX is not part of, nor has it been sent by, the Roman Catholic Church. for Sedevacantism / Recent developments at One Peter Five and the tragic fall of.
So there is no development with Vatican Council II as Pope Benedict said in March 2016. President of Catholic Answers is featured Speaker at SSPX Conference. So Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. Similarly LG 16,LG 8, LG14, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc are not explicit examples of salvation outside the Churh. Hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignoranceI.I) are not exceptions to the dogma on outside the Church there is no salvation. Why OnePeterFive In the 1962 Roman Breviary, there is a recurring theme each night as the day’s office is completed.
Leonard Feeney case and then repeated it with the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre. A journal of Catholic theology, culture, and tradition. The traditionalists do not want to say that they were wrong all these years about Vatican Council II and they made a mistake on doctrine and theology.They held the same position as the liberals and Masons.Īll this confusion could be removed for Maike Hickson if she realized that the magisterium made a theological and doctrinal error in the Fr. Others do not want to say all non Catholics in 2017 are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents. Martin Blackshaw, aka blogger Athanasius, comments on the Holy Week services this year On November 16, 1955, The Sacred Congregation of Rites published the Decree Maxima Redemptionis Nostrae Mysteria, sub-headed The General Decree for the Revised order of Holy Week as promulgated by Pope Pius XII.
Since those who know the truth do not want to say that the magisterium has made a big mistake. Dr.Maike Hickson has asked her souces about extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and they do not want to answer.
0 kommentar(er)
